Technical diligence before the deal, cost recovery in the first hundred days, and a standard for the portfolio that survives the next acquisition.
You get limited access and limited time to form a view on infrastructure quality, cost trajectory, and what remediation will run to after close.
Infrastructure cost usually moves faster than headcount or pricing, which makes it one of the earliest contributions to margin available after close.
Standing up independent infrastructure before the transition services agreement lapses is a fixed deadline set by someone else.
We work at deal pace during diligence and at engineering pace afterward, with the same team carrying what it learned into the build.
An assessment of infrastructure quality, cost trajectory, security posture, and key-person exposure, written for an investment committee and quantified where it can be.
Right-sizing, commitment strategy, and architectural waste addressed early, sequenced so the quantified items land first.
Independent AWS environments built and migrated into ahead of the transition services deadline, with the sequence planned around the date from the start.
A reference account structure, guardrail set, and operating model that the next acquisition can adopt, so each deal starts further along than the last.
Portfolio companies inherit whichever control sets their market requires. We implement against those and evidence them the same way.
Workload discovery, migration planning and sequencing, database and data movement, and cutover with validation.
Containers on ECS and EKS, serverless adoption, CI/CD and delivery automation, Infrastructure as Code, and application refactoring.
Elastic capacity for peak trading, cost control between peaks, and tightly scoped PCI environments for retail and commerce workloads.
Tell us the timeline. We will tell you what can be assessed in the window you have and what it will take after close.
Start the Conversation